Re: struct inode size reduction.

Miles Bader
2003-03-10T04:56:35Z

"J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> writes:
> That was my point, I do not know if some arch still requires 2.95 in 2.6.
> For 2.4, it states 2.95.3 as minimun.

Even if no arch `requires' gcc 2.95 (I don't really know, though until
recently my arch didn't even _have_ a [working] gcc 3.x port!), there
are certainly a buttload of people _using_ it to build the kernel, so
requiring gcc 3.2, would be kind of obnoxious.

-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?