From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:12:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:12:56 -0500 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:4868 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:12:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:12:48 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Albert Cranford Cc: sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] driver core support for i2c bus and drivers Message-ID: <20030310221248.GD13145@kroah.com> References: <20030310072337.GJ6512@kroah.com> <3E6D0D25.26B5584F@attbi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E6D0D25.26B5584F@attbi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 05:09:41PM -0500, Albert Cranford wrote: > I like. The proc/bus directory was geting cluttered. Heh, that's an understatement :) > I think the driver model would be a good for i2c/sensors. It seems to fit quite nicely, and should clean up a lot of the sysctl madness that you have been forced to live with for 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4. > Do you have any input for isa already in your bag of > goodies? Yes, the i2c-isa driver should add itself to the sys/devices/legacy tree, I just hadn't added that patch yet, still bickering with Pat about the interface to register devices there :) thanks, greg k-h