From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 05:21:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 05:21:15 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:8393 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 05:21:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:31:55 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Ben Collins , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] BK->CVS (real time mirror) Message-ID: <20030312103155.GN811@suse.de> References: <20030312034330.GA9324@work.bitmover.com> <20030312041621.GE563@phunnypharm.org> <20030312085517.GK811@suse.de> <20030312032614.G12806@schatzie.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030312032614.G12806@schatzie.adilger.int> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 12 2003, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Some people will just never be happy no matter what you give them. I've been very happy with BK, been using it shortly after Linus started doing so. Mostly out of curiosity at first, later because it was actually quite useful. I even see myself as a fairly pragmatic individual, but even so I do find it increasingly difficult to defend my BK usage. So please stop thinking you can judge that easily by pushing me into your nice little 'some people will never be happy bla bla' category. -- Jens Axboe