From: "Felipe Alfaro Solana" <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
To: jjs@tmsusa.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: named vs 2.5.64-mm5
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:19:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030312191916.20499.qmail@linuxmail.org> (raw)
----- Original Message -----
From: jjs <jjs@tmsusa.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:29:12 -0800
To: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: named vs 2.5.64-mm5
> Greetings -
>
> 2.5.64-mm4 and -mm5 seem more rugged than previous
> kernels, but there are a couple of minor nits - one of them
> is the tendency of named (which appears to work reliably
> under 2.4) to go catatonic under recent 2.5.6x kernels -
>
> More verbose kernel logging may shed some light - or is
> this just a red herring? I get a tons of these in 2.5.64-mm5:
>
> <...>
> process `named' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT
> process `named' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT
> process `named' is using obsolete setsockopt SO_BSDCOMPAT
> <...>
>
> Anybody here running a compliant version of named?
>
> (This is the bind 9.2.1 which ships with Red Hat 8.0)
I would recommend you downloading BIND 9.2.2. It fixes many
bugs. Else, try the latest BIND from RedHat's RawHide repository.
HTH
Felipe
--
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-12 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-12 19:19 Felipe Alfaro Solana [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-12 18:29 named vs 2.5.64-mm5 jjs
2003-03-12 19:31 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-12 21:16 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-12 22:28 ` jjs
2003-03-12 22:29 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-12 22:31 ` jjs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030312191916.20499.qmail@linuxmail.org \
--to=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=jjs@tmsusa.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox