public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Alex Tomas <bzzz@tmi.comex.ru>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:09:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030313190908.GC29631@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3d6kvhzuu.fsf@lexa.home.net>

On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:43:05PM +0300, Alex Tomas wrote:
> 
> fs/attr.c:
>         if (ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) {
>                 if (attr->ia_size == inode->i_size) {
>                         if (ia_valid == ATTR_SIZE)
>                                 goto out;       /* we can skip lock_kernel() */
>                 } else {
>                         lock_kernel();
>                         error = vmtruncate(inode, attr->ia_size);
>                         unlock_kernel();
>                         if (error)
>                                 goto out;
>                 }
>         }
> 
> so, all (!) truncates are serialized

This looks like a bug.  It should be safe to delete them.  Rationale:

 - Documentation/filesystems/Locking says ->truncate is called without the BKL.
 - This isn't the only place vmtruncate() is called.  Several of the callers
   do it without the BKL (eg xfs, cifs).
 - vmtruncate() appears to handle its own locking (mapping->i_shared_sem)

Comments?

-- 
"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-13 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-13  8:55 [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 Alex Tomas
2003-03-13  9:58 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 19:17   ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 22:25     ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:03       ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-13 23:10         ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:03       ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 23:25         ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:56     ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-14  7:20       ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-14 20:59         ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-14 21:14           ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-15  4:37         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15  4:54           ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15  5:30             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15  5:43               ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-15  5:50                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15  5:49             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15  6:20               ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15  6:44                 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15  7:05                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15  8:24                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15  9:47                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 11:58                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 12:08                           ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 12:25                             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15  8:16                   ` [Ext2-devel] " Alex Tomas
2003-03-15  8:29                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15  8:32                       ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-15  9:23                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-14 18:25       ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-14 19:30       ` [Ext2-devel] " Daniel Phillips
2003-03-14 19:55         ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 17:39 ` [Ext2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2003-03-13 18:43   ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 19:09     ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2003-03-13 19:39       ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 19:23   ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-03-13 19:44     ` Andreas Dilger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030313190908.GC29631@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --to=willy@debian.org \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=bzzz@tmi.comex.ru \
    --cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox