From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: bzzz@tmi.comex.ru, adilger@clusterfs.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:49:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030315054910.GN20188@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030314205455.49f834c2.akpm@digeo.com>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 08:54:55PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> `dbench 512' will presumably do lots of IO and spend significant
> time in I/O wait. You should see the effects of this change more
> if you use fewer clients (say, 32) so it doesn't hit disk.
Throughput 226.57 MB/sec 32 procs
dbench 32 2>& 1 25.04s user 515.02s system 1069% cpu 50.516 total
vma samples %-age symbol name
c0106ff4 1877599 35.8654 default_idle
c01dc3b0 586997 11.2127 __copy_to_user_ll
c0108140 193213 3.6907 .text.lock.semaphore
c015249a 137467 2.62586 .text.lock.file_table
c01dc418 117981 2.25364 __copy_from_user_ll
c01dc59c 115415 2.20463 .text.lock.dec_and_lock
c016997b 106198 2.02857 .text.lock.dcache
c0119dac 98439 1.88036 scheduler_tick
c01dc510 95745 1.8289 atomic_dec_and_lock
c0119058 91746 1.75251 try_to_wake_up
c011fadc 88996 1.69998 profile_hook
c0107d0c 84514 1.61436 __down
c01522a0 70518 1.34702 file_move
c011a1bc 68364 1.30587 schedule
c011c4ff 59716 1.14068 .text.lock.sched
c0168aac 58337 1.11434 d_lookup
c015f3dc 58111 1.11002 path_lookup
c0119860 55141 1.05329 load_balance
procs -----------memory---------- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu----
r b free buff cache bi bo in cs us sy id wa
11 0 47538048 549664 737120 0 0 1028 12123 2 33 65 0
6 2 47534592 550880 738272 0 16312 1085 12498 2 28 67 3
15 2 47559680 552064 711936 0 2332 1111 12197 2 30 63 6
10 3 47539648 547808 737344 0 5012 1174 12683 2 28 63 8
13 4 47585600 548736 689728 0 1616 1173 12393 2 31 58 8
17 2 47575680 550432 699264 0 2252 1224 12135 2 35 54 8
31 2 47643008 550944 631712 0 2216 1189 4795 2 82 15 2
28 1 47724288 551296 548320 0 2532 1178 4297 2 77 18 4
25 2 47798464 552032 473824 0 2724 1199 3283 2 73 22 3
12 5 48026944 552096 243296 0 2272 1170 4389 2 54 37 7
0 9 48201344 552160 69696 0 3480 1167 466 0 8 62 29
1 4 48206720 552160 64512 0 3252 1173 152 0 0 83 16
1 2 48210880 552160 60864 0 3232 1163 106 0 0 90 9
2 2 48210880 552160 60864 0 3592 1163 111 0 0 93 6
1 8 48256320 552160 36928 0 3008 1146 587 0 2 79 20
2 7 48264128 552160 30016 0 3488 1153 170 0 0 76 24
2 6 48268544 552160 26912 0 3012 1151 145 0 0 79 21
2 5 48273408 552160 22400 0 312 1162 116 0 0 83 16
4 0 48277248 552160 21056 12 8 1051 184 0 1 97 1
0 0 48280448 552160 21280 0 0 1033 59 0 0 100 0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-15 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-13 8:55 [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 9:58 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 19:17 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-13 23:10 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:03 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-14 7:20 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-14 20:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-14 21:14 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 4:37 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 4:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 5:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 5:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-15 5:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 5:49 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-03-15 6:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 6:44 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 7:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 8:24 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 9:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 11:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 12:08 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 12:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 8:16 ` [Ext2-devel] " Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 8:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 8:32 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 9:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-14 18:25 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-14 19:30 ` [Ext2-devel] " Daniel Phillips
2003-03-14 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 17:39 ` [Ext2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2003-03-13 18:43 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 19:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-13 19:39 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 19:23 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-03-13 19:44 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030315054910.GN20188@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=bzzz@tmi.comex.ru \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox