From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Alex Tomas <bzzz@tmi.comex.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 00:29:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030315082927.GR20188@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3r899yrhx.fsf@lexa.home.net>
Andrew Morton (AM) writes:
AM> Nope. What we're trying to measure here is pure in-memory lock
AM> contention, locked bus traffic, context switches, etc, etc. To
AM> do that we need to get the IO system out of the picture.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 11:16:10AM +0300, Alex Tomas wrote:
> I simple use own pretty simple test. btw, you may disable preallocation
> to increase allocation rate
This looks very interesting, but it may have to wait ca. 24 hours for
some benchmark time b/c of the long boot times and late hour in .us.
This also looks like it would be a much better stress test, and the
NUMA-Q is known for bringing out many rare races. There is are good
reasons to run this test even aside from performance.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-15 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-13 8:55 [PATCH] concurrent block allocation for ext2 against 2.5.64 Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 9:58 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 19:17 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-13 23:10 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:03 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 23:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 23:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-14 7:20 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-14 20:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-14 21:14 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 4:37 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 4:54 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 5:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 5:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-15 5:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 5:49 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 6:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 6:44 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 7:05 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 8:24 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 9:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 11:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 12:08 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-15 12:25 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-15 8:16 ` [Ext2-devel] " Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 8:29 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-03-15 8:32 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-15 9:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-14 18:25 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-14 19:30 ` [Ext2-devel] " Daniel Phillips
2003-03-14 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 17:39 ` [Ext2-devel] " Andreas Dilger
2003-03-13 18:43 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-13 19:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-13 19:39 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-13 19:23 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-03-13 19:44 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030315082927.GR20188@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=bzzz@tmi.comex.ru \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox