public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Alex Tomas <bzzz@tmi.comex.ru>
Cc: wind@cocodriloo.com, riel@surriel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4 vm, program load, page faulting, ...
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:05:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030317140506.686282a5.akpm@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3hea2gcoz.fsf@lexa.home.net>

Alex Tomas <bzzz@tmi.comex.ru> wrote:
>
>  w> You should ask Andrew about his patch to do exactly that: he
>  w> forced all PROC_EXEC mmaps to be nonlinear-mapped and this forced
>  w> all programs to suck entire binaries into memory...  I recall he
>  w> saw at least 25% improvement at launching gnome.
> 
> they talked about pages _already present_ in pagecache.

2.5.64-mm8 does that too.  At mmap-time it will, for a PROT_EXEC mapping,
pull every affected page off disk and it will instantiate pte's against
them all via install_page().

So there should be zero major and minor faults against that mmap region
during application startup.

The improved IO layout appears to halve startup time for big things.  I
haven't attempted to instrument the effects of the reduced minor fault rate. 
If indeed the rate _has_ decreased.  If it hasn't, it's a bug...



This is all a bit dubious for several reasons.  Most particularly, the
up-front instantiation of the pages in pagetables makes unneeded pages harder
to reclaim.  It would be really neat if someone could try putting the
madvise(MADV_WILLNEED) into glibc and test that.  Maybe on a 2.4 kernel.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-17 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-16  4:59 2.4 vm, program load, page faulting, Paul Albrecht
2003-03-17 15:02 ` Rik van Riel
2003-03-17 15:10   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-17 16:01     ` Rik van Riel
2003-03-17 16:52       ` wind
2003-03-17 16:50         ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-17 17:12           ` wind-lkml
2003-03-17 17:38             ` wind-lkml
2003-03-17 18:57               ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-03-17 19:06                 ` wind-lkml
2003-03-17 19:34                   ` wind
2003-03-17 22:05           ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-03-17 23:08             ` wind
2003-03-17 23:28               ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-18  0:12                 ` wind
2003-03-17 16:37     ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-18  7:43   ` Paul Albrecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030317140506.686282a5.akpm@digeo.com \
    --to=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=bzzz@tmi.comex.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=wind@cocodriloo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox