public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: Joel.Becker@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:29:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030320082947.GM4990@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030320002050.44f13857.akpm@digeo.com>

On Thu, Mar 20 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > Besides, deadline is still the most solid choice.
> 
> Deadline will always be the best choice for OLTP workloads.  Or CFQ - it
> should perform the same.
> 
> All this workload does is seeks all over the disk doing teeny synchronous
> I/O's.  It is the worst-case for AS.
> 
> What we are trying to do at present is to make AS not _too_ bad for these
> workloads so that people with mixed workloads or who are not familiar with
> kernel arcanery don't accidentally end up with something which is
> significantly slower than it should be.
> 
> It is an interesting test case.

I understand that. A deadline run is still interesting if there are
regressions from -mm2 to -mm3, for example. If deadline shows the same
regression, it's likely not a newly introduced AS bug.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-20  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-19 23:28 WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2 Joel Becker
2003-03-20  1:57 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-20  0:38   ` Joel Becker
2003-03-20  0:55     ` Nick Piggin
2003-03-20  8:04     ` Jens Axboe
2003-03-20  8:20       ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-20  8:29         ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2003-03-20 15:01           ` Nick Piggin
2003-03-20 18:32             ` Joel Becker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030320082947.GM4990@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox