From: James Wright <james@jigsawdezign.com>
To: "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>
Cc: jun.nakajima@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: P4 3.06Ghz Hyperthreading with 2.4.20?
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 23:45:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030320234501.45e9bdc8.james@jigsawdezign.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F760B14C9561B941B89469F59BA3A84725A210@orsmsx401.jf.intel.com>
Problem Solved!!! I had foolishly enabled ACPI CPU Enumeration Only, i switched this off
and now all is working!!! wow... checkout those BogoMIPS;
CPU0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.06GHz stepping 07
CPU1: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.06GHz stepping 07
Total of 2 processors activated (12242.12 BogoMIPS).
Thanks for your quick response,
James
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:32:00 -0800
"Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > From: James Wright [mailto:james@jigsawdezign.com]
> > ACPI: Local APIC address 0xfee00000
> > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x00] lapic_id[0x00] enabled)
> > Processor #0 Pentium 4(tm) XEON(tm) APIC version 16
> > ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x01] enabled)
> > Processor #1 Pentium 4(tm) XEON(tm) APIC version 16
>
> There should be some messages about IO APICs right here. To be SMP, you
> need IO APICs.
>
> If you did the ACPI cpu enumeration only, please try the full ACPI
> support. That is the only reason I can think of (except for !CONFIG_SMP)
> as to why the IO APIC(s) could be overlooked.
>
> > Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=linux ro root=302 acpismp=force
>
> Don't need acpismp=force, btw. With the patch off sf.net it is on by
> default - you can use acpi=off to disable it, though. ;-)
>
> Regards -- Andy
>
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:11:10 -0800
> > "Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > From: James Wright [mailto:james@jigsawdezign.com]
> > > > So i can apply the ACPI patch to 2.4.20, and it will work,
> > > > even though my motherboard BIOS
> > > > doesn't provide the MPS table?
> > >
> > > Yes, because ACPI uses a different table.
> > >
> > > > Do i still need to use
> > > > "acpismp=force" option?
> > >
> > > Nope.
> > >
> > > > What do you mean
> > > > by *configuring* acpi
> > >
> > > Configuring it into your kernel, presumably, using make menuconfig.
> > >
> > > > do i need the "acpid" or other
> > > > resources, than just enabling it?
> > >
> > > Nope, all the SMP detection stuff is in the kernel.
> > >
> > > Regards -- Andy
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:50:59 -0800
> > > > "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > You need to apply the ACPI patch:
> > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/acpi and *configure* APIC.
> > > > >
> > > > > The 2.4 kernel depends on the MPS table for all but logical
> > > > processors. If MPS table is not present, it will fall back to UP.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Jun
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: James Wright [mailto:james@jigsawdezign.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 5:34 PM
> > > > > > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > Subject: P4 3.06Ghz Hyperthreading with 2.4.20?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have kernel 2.4.20 with a single P4 3.06Ghz CPU and
> > > > Asus P4G8X
> > > > > > motherboard
> > > > > > (with the Intel E7205) Chipset. I have enabled
> > > > Hyperthreading in the BIOS
> > > > > > options,
> > > > > > compiled in SMP & ACPI support, and also tried adding
> > > > "acpismp=force" to
> > > > > > my lilo
> > > > > > kernel cmdline, but it just doesn't seem to detect the
> > > > second Logical CPU.
> > > > > > My
> > > > > > current theory is that this is bcos Linux expects the
> > > > motherboard to be an
> > > > > > SMP
> > > > > > item (as with the Xeon boards) but this board is a Single
> > > > processor board,
> > > > > > ansd
> > > > > > doesn't have an MP table, but the cpu info is held in the
> > > > ACPI tables.?!?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have tried installing 2.5.65 but can't get past the
> > > > compile due to
> > > > > > compile-time
> > > > > > errors... Is this a known problem? SHall i just disable
> > > > Hyperthreading
> > > > > > until a new
> > > > > > kernel release?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > James
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > > > linux-kernel" in
> > > > > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > More majordomo info at
> > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > > > > Please
> > read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > > > > -
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > > > linux-kernel" in
> > > > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > More majordomo info at
> > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > > > Please read
> > the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > > > >
> > > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > > > linux-kernel" in
> > > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-20 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-20 22:32 P4 3.06Ghz Hyperthreading with 2.4.20? Grover, Andrew
2003-03-20 23:45 ` James Wright [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-20 17:11 Grover, Andrew
2003-03-20 21:29 ` James Wright
2003-03-20 22:27 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-03-20 2:53 Nakajima, Jun
2003-03-20 2:50 Nakajima, Jun
2003-03-20 13:37 ` James Wright
2003-03-20 1:34 James Wright
2003-03-20 1:32 James Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030320234501.45e9bdc8.james@jigsawdezign.com \
--to=james@jigsawdezign.com \
--cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox