From: rwhron@earthlink.net
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: benchmark anobjrmap with 2.5.65-mm2
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:08:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030322170855.GA25553@rushmore> (raw)
Anonymous objrmap patches appear to several workloads
a little for uniprocessor K6/2 475 mhz with 2 ide disks
and 384 MB ram.
Build times for autoconf (a fork test), kernel, and perl.
autoconf kernel perl
2.5.65 3845 1641 1348 seconds
2.5.65-mm1 3898 1646 1326
2.5.65-mm2 3895 1582 1312
2.5.65-mm2-anobjrmap 3824 1614 1284
autoconf and perl builds were faster with anon obj rmap.
kernel build was not. kernel build uses pipe more than
autoconf/perl build. Could be the fact there was only
one sample too.
Lmbench pipe latency and bandwidth don't provide an obvious
explanation why kernel build was slower with anobjrmap.
*Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
kernel Pipe
2.5.65 15.36 ms
2.5.65-mm1 15.80
2.5.65-mm2 15.21
2.5.65-mm2-anobjrmap 14.11
*Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better
kernel Pipe
2.5.65 64.5 MB/second
2.5.65-mm1 63.3
2.5.65-mm2 65.9
2.5.65-mm2-anobjrmap 65.1
I'm running 2.5.65-mm3 now and will watch how kernel build
goes there.
AIM7 workloads were generally a hair faster with anobjrmap.
More benchmarks on recent kernels at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/latest.html
Irman process load starvation still appears in 2.5.65 and
2.5.65-mm[12].
--
Randy Hron
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html
reply other threads:[~2003-03-22 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030322170855.GA25553@rushmore \
--to=rwhron@earthlink.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox