public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rwhron@earthlink.net
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: benchmark anobjrmap with 2.5.65-mm2
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:08:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030322170855.GA25553@rushmore> (raw)

Anonymous objrmap patches appear to several workloads
a little for uniprocessor K6/2 475 mhz with 2 ide disks 
and 384 MB ram.

Build times for autoconf (a fork test), kernel, and perl.

                           autoconf    kernel         perl
2.5.65                     3845          1641         1348 seconds
2.5.65-mm1                 3898          1646         1326
2.5.65-mm2                 3895          1582         1312
2.5.65-mm2-anobjrmap       3824          1614         1284

autoconf and perl builds were faster with anon obj rmap.
kernel build was not.  kernel build uses pipe more than
autoconf/perl build.  Could be the fact there was only
one sample too.

Lmbench pipe latency and bandwidth don't provide an obvious
explanation why kernel build was slower with anobjrmap.

*Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better

kernel                           Pipe   
2.5.65                           15.36 ms 
2.5.65-mm1                       15.80  
2.5.65-mm2                       15.21  
2.5.65-mm2-anobjrmap             14.11  

*Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better

kernel                           Pipe  
2.5.65                            64.5 MB/second
2.5.65-mm1                        63.3 
2.5.65-mm2                        65.9 
2.5.65-mm2-anobjrmap              65.1 

I'm running 2.5.65-mm3 now and will watch how kernel build
goes there.

AIM7 workloads were generally a hair faster with anobjrmap.

More benchmarks on recent kernels at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/latest.html

Irman process load starvation still appears in 2.5.65 and 
2.5.65-mm[12].

-- 
Randy Hron
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html


                 reply	other threads:[~2003-03-22 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030322170855.GA25553@rushmore \
    --to=rwhron@earthlink.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox