From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 08:26:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 08:26:12 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:7142 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 08:26:11 -0500 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200303231337.h2NDbGP01132@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.65-ac3 To: gmack@innerfire.net (Gerhard Mack) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 08:37:16 -0500 (EST) Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), jgarzik@pobox.com (Jeff Garzik), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Gerhard Mack" at Mar 22, 2003 10:23:18 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > How close are IDE and vt switching to working with preempt ? 2.5 IDE probably does in 2.5 now, although I don't trust the reset paths with it yet. Its just part of all the IDE debugging and locking fixing that has to be done and will gradually improve over time. Its not a technical issue with pre-empt any more afaik.