* [BENCHMARK] 2.5.65-mm3,4 with contest
@ 2003-03-24 5:39 Con Kolivas
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Con Kolivas @ 2003-03-24 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux kernel mailing list
Anticipatory scheduler tested...
no significant difference from 2.5.65-mm2
CFQ scheduler shows some fluctuations in results. At first I thought it was a
mem leak because they were getting longer, but then they decreased again.
Results are not consistent enough to give meaningful benchmark results at the
moment. Still trying to track down what happened.
The only thing I can say with certainty is read load is faster than the AS
(108 seconds v 122), and mem load is a little faster (98 v 102).
Con
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-03-24 5:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-24 5:39 [BENCHMARK] 2.5.65-mm3,4 with contest Con Kolivas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox