public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 64GB NUMA-Q after pgcl
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 23:57:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030328075730.GP30140@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0303280243080.2884-100000@montezuma.mastecende.com>

On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 02:45:30AM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> before:
> Memory: 65306956k/67100672k available (1724k kernel code, 98252k reserved, 781k data, 284k init, 65134592k highmem)
> after:
> Memory: 65946144k/67100672k available (1956k kernel code, 15936k reserved, 667k data, 300k init, 65198080k highmem)
> Would you mind explaining the details as to what would cause that 
> discrepancy in reserved memory size?

Sure. On NUMA-Q mem_map[] is not allocated using bootmem except for
node 0. Various other bootmem allocations are also proportional to
memory as measured in units of PAGE_SIZE, but not all.

So all we're seeing here is node 0's mem_map[] with "miscellaneous"
bootmem allocations thrown in, whether reduced or increased.

This is not very reflective of what's going on as the majority of mem_map[]
is allocated through a custom reservation mechanism as opposed to bootmem.


-- wli

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-28  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-28  4:00 64GB NUMA-Q after pgcl William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-28  7:45 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-03-28  7:57   ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-03-28  8:05     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-03-28 10:14       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-28 17:38         ` John Levon
2003-03-30 23:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-03-31  4:27   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-31  5:22     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-31 21:02       ` Ingo Oeser
2003-03-31 22:27         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-01  1:25           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-03-31 18:35     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-03-31 18:41       ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-03-31 19:08         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-01  0:47           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-04-01  0:44         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-03-31 18:55       ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030328075730.GP30140@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox