From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:31:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:31:41 -0500 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:46525 "EHLO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:31:37 -0500 Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 22:41:31 +0100 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: war , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.20 Raid Bug? Message-ID: <20030329214131.GC2755@marowsky-bree.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2003-03-29T16:03:51, war said: > 8 root 18446744073709551615 -20 0 0 0 SW< 0.0 0.0 > 0:00 [mdrecoveryd] > > I guess I'll use LVM. Thanks for this detailed bug report. Apparently, that naughty mailing list software apparently has dared to cut out the "how to reproduce" section, as well as all the other relevant information, notably exact kernel revision, relevant kernel config settings, compiler used, the RAID / md configuration involved etc, all of which you certainly provided. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée -- SuSE Labs - Research & Development, SuSE Linux AG "If anything can go wrong, it will." "Chance favors the prepared (mind)." -- Capt. Edward A. Murphy -- Louis Pasteur