From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 03:01:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 03:01:32 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:29829 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 03:01:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:12:31 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Christoph Rohland Cc: Hugh Dickins , tomlins@cam.org, CaT , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH: allow percentile size of tmpfs (2.5.66 / 2.4.20-pre2) Message-ID: <20030402081231.GB993@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Christoph Rohland , Hugh Dickins , tomlins@cam.org, CaT , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:20:50AM +0200, Christoph Rohland wrote: > No, I always thought the 50% RAM was a terrible hack. And IMHO it is > one of the biggest usability gaps of tmpfs. I've never had an issue with it. I just made sure it was large enough. -- wli