Re: PATCH: allow percentile size of tmpfs (2.5.66 / 2.4.20-pre2)

Daniel Egger
2003-04-01T19:00:39Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 435 bytes --]

Am Die, 2003-04-01 um 18.24 schrieb Christoph Rohland:

> But on these systems you better use ramfs.

Just curious: Why? I'm using tmpfs on these systems and I'm rather
satisfied with it; especially the option to limit the amount of space
makes it rather useful. According to the documentation ramfs is most
useful as an educational example how to write filesystems not as a
real filesystem...

--
Servus,
Daniel

[-- Attachment #2: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]