From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261412AbTDCReu (for ); Thu, 3 Apr 2003 12:34:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261427AbTDCReu (for ); Thu, 3 Apr 2003 12:34:50 -0500 Received: from deviant.impure.org.uk ([195.82.120.238]:60339 "EHLO deviant.impure.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261412AbTDCRer (for ); Thu, 3 Apr 2003 12:34:47 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 18:45:26 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Shawn Starr Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: acpi spinlock breakage Message-ID: <20030403174521.GA25720@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Shawn Starr , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <200304031226.12300.shawn.starr@datawire.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304031226.12300.shawn.starr@datawire.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 12:26:12PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: > Confirmed :-( > > Trying to find out what broke, but none of those members are listed even > inside osl.c (perhaps a header down the line). They're members of the spinlock_t struct. That acpi_handle needs to be a spinlock_t * Dave