From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263667AbTDDN6F (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 08:58:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263546AbTDDNxS (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 08:53:18 -0500 Received: from mail.set-software.de ([193.218.212.121]:39101 "EHLO gateway.local.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263627AbTDDNuc convert rfc822-to-8bit (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 08:50:32 -0500 From: Michael Knigge Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 14:00:44 GMT Message-ID: <20030404.14004462@knigge.local.net> Subject: Re: Strange e1000 To: "Paul Rolland" CC: In-Reply-To: <043501c2faaf$da061e10$3f00a8c0@witbe> References: <043501c2faaf$da061e10$3f00a8c0@witbe> X-Mailer: Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; StarOffice/5.1; Win32) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, > Could it be possible that the 1000MBps FD on the e1000 side is > a local configuration, and that it needs some time to discuss with > the Netgear switch to negotiate correctly speed and duplex before > working correctly ? (i.e. 20 sec = negotiation time) Hmmm, I don't think so but I will try to A) force e1000 to negotiate only 1000/FD and B) configure the switch to force 1000/FD Maybee it wil help.... Bye Michael