public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Justin Cormack <justin@street-vision.com>
Cc: Paul Rolland <rol@as2917.net>,
	"'Michael Knigge'" <Michael.Knigge@set-software.de>,
	Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Strange e1000
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:48:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030404154842.GA10607@gtf.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1049467531.2676.87.camel@lotte>

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:45:25PM +0100, Justin Cormack wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 14:41, Paul Rolland wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > > when I load the e1000 module, my NIC is recognized. Then, "pump -i 
> > > eth0" is called (DHCP-Client), the message "e1000: eth0 NIC 
> > > Link is Up 
> > > 1000 Mbps Full Duplex" appears and after some time I get the message 
> > > "operation failed".
> > > 
> > > When I sleep some time (currently 20 seconds) before doing 
> > > the "pump", 
> > > everything works as expected.
> > > 
> > > What the hell is happening here? Ok, I got it working with the 
> > > 20-sec-sleep but this is not the way it sould work...
> > > 
> > > My Board is a Gigabyte GA-7ZXR (1.0) and the Intel NIC is a PRO/1000 
> > > MT (should be the 82540OEM Chip). The NIC is attached to a NetGear 
> > > FSM726S Switch (24x100 + 2x1000). It is currenty the only box 
> > > attached 
> > 
> > Could it be possible that the 1000MBps FD on the e1000 side is
> > a local configuration, and that it needs some time to discuss with
> > the Netgear switch to negotiate correctly speed and duplex before 
> > working correctly ? (i.e. 20 sec = negotiation time)
> 
> It is probably something like this. For some reason the managed Netgear
> switches take a very long time to do anything. Log into the switch and
> watch the port status while this happens to confirm. I actually can't
> netboot off these switches because if this. Hopefully Netgear will come
> up with a fix.

In another thread, Scott Feldman (one of the e1000 team) asked if
spanning trees were enabled on the switch.  That could be a potential
cause.

	Jeff




  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-04 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-04  7:25 Strange e1000 Michael Knigge
2003-04-04 13:41 ` Paul Rolland
2003-04-04 14:00   ` Michael Knigge
2003-04-04 14:19   ` Abhishek Agrawal
2003-04-04 18:14     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-05  8:41       ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-04-04 14:45   ` Justin Cormack
2003-04-04 15:48     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-04-04 17:02       ` Patrick R. McManus
2003-04-04 17:09         ` Patrick R. McManus
2003-04-07  7:45           ` Strange e1000 - SOLVED Michael Knigge
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-07 21:52 Strange e1000 Mroczek, Joseph T

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030404154842.GA10607@gtf.org \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=Michael.Knigge@set-software.de \
    --cc=justin@street-vision.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rol@as2917.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox