From: "Patrick R. McManus" <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Justin Cormack <justin@street-vision.com>,
Paul Rolland <rol@as2917.net>,
"'Michael Knigge'" <Michael.Knigge@set-software.de>,
Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Strange e1000
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:02:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030404170214.GA1457@ducksong.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030404154842.GA10607@gtf.org>
[Jeff Garzik: Apr 04 10:48]
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 03:45:25PM +0100, Justin Cormack wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 14:41, Paul Rolland wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > > when I load the e1000 module, my NIC is recognized. Then, "pump -i
> > > > eth0" is called (DHCP-Client), the message "e1000: eth0 NIC
> > > > Link is Up
> > > > 1000 Mbps Full Duplex" appears and after some time I get the message
> > > > "operation failed".
> > > >
> > > > When I sleep some time (currently 20 seconds) before doing
> > > > the "pump",
> > > > everything works as expected.
> > > >
[..]
> > It is probably something like this. For some reason the managed Netgear
> > switches take a very long time to do anything. Log into the switch and
> > watch the port status while this happens to confirm. I actually can't
> > netboot off these switches because if this. Hopefully Netgear will come
> > up with a fix.
>
> In another thread, Scott Feldman (one of the e1000 team) asked if
> spanning trees were enabled on the switch. That could be a potential
> cause.
I can confirm this is isolated to the managed netgear switches.. I
started the other thread jeff mentions and, just this morning, cobbled
together a network without them and had no problems. I'll see if I can
create a setup without spanning tree to test that explicitly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-04 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-04 7:25 Strange e1000 Michael Knigge
2003-04-04 13:41 ` Paul Rolland
2003-04-04 14:00 ` Michael Knigge
2003-04-04 14:19 ` Abhishek Agrawal
2003-04-04 18:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-05 8:41 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-04-04 14:45 ` Justin Cormack
2003-04-04 15:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-04 17:02 ` Patrick R. McManus [this message]
2003-04-04 17:09 ` Patrick R. McManus
2003-04-07 7:45 ` Strange e1000 - SOLVED Michael Knigge
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-07 21:52 Strange e1000 Mroczek, Joseph T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030404170214.GA1457@ducksong.com \
--to=mcmanus@ducksong.com \
--cc=Michael.Knigge@set-software.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=justin@street-vision.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rol@as2917.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox