From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263803AbTDDSCh (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:02:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263805AbTDDSCg (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:02:36 -0500 Received: from havoc.daloft.com ([64.213.145.173]:23425 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263803AbTDDSCf (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:02:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:14:00 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: Abhishek Agrawal Cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: Strange e1000 Message-ID: <20030404181400.GA26545@gtf.org> References: <043501c2faaf$da061e10$3f00a8c0@witbe> <1049465969.3324.40.camel@abhilinux.cygnet.co.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1049465969.3324.40.camel@abhilinux.cygnet.co.in> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 07:49:28PM +0530, Abhishek Agrawal wrote: > On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 19:11, Paul Rolland wrote: > > > Could it be possible that the 1000MBps FD on the e1000 side is > > a local configuration, and that it needs some time to discuss with > > the Netgear switch to negotiate correctly speed and duplex before > > working correctly ? (i.e. 20 sec = negotiation time) > Autoneg must be completed within 2 sec, or else it is considered as > failed. If we follow this rule, we have lots of Cisco and other network gear that will not be able to communicate with Linux. Jeff