From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261672AbTDEBNR (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:13:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261665AbTDEBNQ (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:13:16 -0500 Received: from to-telus.redhat.com ([207.219.125.105]:62716 "EHLO touchme.toronto.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261664AbTDEBNM (for ); Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:13:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:24:42 -0500 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: "J.A. Magallon" Cc: lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH] AT_PLATFORM on HT-P4 Message-ID: <20030404202442.B21819@redhat.com> References: <20030405004327.GA11141@werewolf.able.es> <20030405005020.GA11904@werewolf.able.es> <20030404201839.A21819@redhat.com> <20030405012216.GA3318@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030405012216.GA3318@werewolf.able.es>; from jamagallon@able.es on Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 03:22:16AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 03:22:16AM +0200, J.A. Magallon wrote: > Sorry, I said it in other post... > I use balsa-cvs as mailer, and I have just discovered that it wraps > the mail body at 72 columns even if I say it to don't do any wrapping. You have the source, and you know that people like to read patches on l-k... Don't you remember the numerous lectures from Linus et al about unquotable patches being bad? I think there's even an entry in the lkml FAQ on this very topic. -ben -- Junk email? aart@kvack.org