From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262502AbTDEPqW (for ); Sat, 5 Apr 2003 10:46:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262505AbTDEPqW (for ); Sat, 5 Apr 2003 10:46:22 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:10760 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262502AbTDEPqV (for ); Sat, 5 Apr 2003 10:46:21 -0500 Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 16:57:51 +0100 From: Russell King To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Makefile bug Message-ID: <20030405165751.A22180@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl on Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 04:08:58PM +0200 X-Message-Flag: Your copy of Microsoft Outlook is vurnerable to viruses. See www.mutt.org for more details. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 04:08:58PM +0200, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote: > A moment ago I again encountered the infamous > Error inserting 'module.o': -1 Invalid module format > > What is wrong this time? Hmm. > version magic '2.5.65' should be '2.5.66' > > Aha. So the command "make modules" given in a tree that used > to be 2.5.65 and was patched up to 2.5.66 fails to rebuild > modules. > > The dependency goes > foo.mod.c includes > includes > > (this happens for all modules, so is a generic makefile bug). Kai has a fix which he's tested. I have it in my tree ready for the next kernel release to confirm that this problem has gone. Maybe Kai will post it to lkml... -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html