public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Martin Bligh <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Subject: Re: 2.5.65-preempt booting on 32way NUMAQ
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 04:23:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030406112340.GM993@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0304060625130.2268-100000@montezuma.mastecende.com>

On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 06:48:33AM -0400, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Robert i suppose you can add another notch on your erm.. bedpost(?) 
> and congratulations to all the kernel developers! It survived some 
> local networking stress tests, but there is more fun stuff like tty 
> layer to completely obliterate ;)

Wow!

This has had a hard time historically. I'm really glad NUMA-Q's are now
immune (in the sense of correctness) to this config; previously it was
believed that preemption points in printk(linux_banner) would take out
the machine early in boot if preemption was enabled.

Congratulations rml!

If you're booting without issues on these things, you are a _very_ long
way toward being race-free. This is incredibly good news, both for the
preemption support, and for the general stability of the i386 bootstrap.

All that's really left is driver and non-i386 arch coverage if I'm right.


-- wli

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-06 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-06 10:48 2.5.65-preempt booting on 32way NUMAQ Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-04-06 11:23 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-04-06 11:25   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-04-06 18:30   ` Robert Love
2003-04-06 21:46     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-06 21:50       ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-04-06 22:10         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-06 22:03       ` Robert Love
2003-04-06 22:07         ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-04-06 23:19           ` Robert Love
2003-04-06 18:28 ` Robert Love
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-06 19:33 Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030406112340.GM993@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox