From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@RedHat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [NFS] [PATCH] mmap corruption
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:00:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030407140052.GA1471@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16016.7633.982870.860147@charged.uio.no>
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 02:30:09PM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >>>>> " " == Steve Dickson <SteveD@RedHat.com> writes:
> > /*
> > * Every time either npages or ncommit had a value and the file
> > size is
> > * immediately changed (with in a microsecond or two) by another
> > * truncation, followed by a mmap read, the file would be
> > corrupted.
> > */
> > if (NFS_I(inode)->npages || NFS_I(inode)->ncommit ||
> > NFS_I(inode)->ndirty) {
> > printk("nfs_notify_change: fid %Ld npages %d ncommit
> > %d ndirty %d\n", NFS_FILEID(inode),
> > NFS_I(inode)->npages, ncommit, NFS_I(inode)->ndirty);
> > }
> > }
>
> My point is that nfs_wb_all() is supposed to ensure that
> NFS_I(inode)->ncommit, and/or NFS_I(inode)->ndirty are both
> zero. i.e. you can have pending reads (in which case
> NFS_I(inode)->npages != 0), but *no* pending writes.
>
> Was this the case?
OK, I understand your point. And Yes, ndirty and ncommit
always seem to be zero when nfs_wb_all() returns. Only
when npages != 0 is when I get the corruption.
I didn't realize that npages != 0 meant there are only pending
reads *not* pending writes... Thanks for that clarification....
SteveD.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-07 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-04 19:20 [NFS] [PATCH] mmap corruption Steve Dickson
2003-04-04 22:01 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-04-05 16:47 ` Steve Dickson
2003-04-06 12:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-04-07 14:00 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2003-04-07 14:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-04-07 17:39 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030407140052.GA1471@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox