Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck*

Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck*

[Con Kolivas]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I've had numerous requests for a backport of the interactivity changes to the 
O(1) scheduler for the -ck* kernels. I have resisted posting my backport 
because people had described real problems with these patches. However it 
seems most, if not all of the problems are related to one patch. 

I've posted a special split out patch 
(001_o1_int_pe_ll_030407_ck_2.4.20.patch) for ck that includes the new 
interactivity changes, with the one patch responsible for problems backed 
out. No desktop tuning patch is supposed to be necessary for this so I've 
removed it from the site.Note that the full -ck4 patch does not include this 
update. I would like some feedback from people using it before I make a more 
substantial update to bring out a -ck5. The patches must be applied manually 
in order as they're desired. I've been using them for a little while without 
any problems. 

Get them here:

http://kernel.kolivas.org

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+kYLlF6dfvkL3i1gRAk4+AKClVUe0bhxJKSM5rls1zEfNE9TymQCglChA
xheK/JrNmZUnpm14LhgKMeQ=
=/Vun
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck*

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

On Monday 07 April 2003 15:53, Con Kolivas wrote:

Hi Con,

> I've had numerous requests for a backport of the interactivity changes to
> the O(1) scheduler for the -ck* kernels. I have resisted posting my
> backport because people had described real problems with these patches.
> However it seems most, if not all of the problems are related to one patch.
> Get them here:
> http://kernel.kolivas.org
Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can see 
what is new?

ciao, Marc

Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck*

[Con Kolivas]

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 00:17, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Monday 07 April 2003 15:53, Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> Hi Con,
>
> > I've had numerous requests for a backport of the interactivity changes to
> > the O(1) scheduler for the -ck* kernels. I have resisted posting my
> > backport because people had described real problems with these patches.
> > However it seems most, if not all of the problems are related to one
> > patch. Get them here:
> > http://kernel.kolivas.org
>
> Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can see
> what is new?

Yeah sure here:

http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4

Con

Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck*

[Con Kolivas]

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 00:15, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 00:17, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> > On Monday 07 April 2003 15:53, Con Kolivas wrote:
> >
> > Hi Con,
> >
> > > I've had numerous requests for a backport of the interactivity changes
> > > to the O(1) scheduler for the -ck* kernels. I have resisted posting my
> > > backport because people had described real problems with these patches.
> > > However it seems most, if not all of the problems are related to one
> > > patch. Get them here:
> > > http://kernel.kolivas.org
> >
> > Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can
> > see what is new?
>
> Yeah sure here:

Oops I mean here:

http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4.bz2

Con

Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck*

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

On Monday 07 April 2003 16:24, Con Kolivas wrote:

Hi Con,

> > > Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can
> > > see what is new?
> > Yeah sure here:
> Oops I mean here:
> http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4.bz2
ty :) I'll take a look.

ciao, Marc

Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck*

[Josh McKinney]

On approximately Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 12:15:11AM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
>
> > Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can see
> > what is new?
> 
> Yeah sure here:
> 
> http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4
> 

Is this patch supposed to be against ck3?

Josh

Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck*

[Marc-Christian Petersen]

On Monday 07 April 2003 21:30, Josh McKinney wrote:

Hi Josh,

> > Yeah sure here:
> > http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4
                                      ^^^^
> Is this patch supposed to be against ck3?

see? ;)

ciao, Marc

Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck*

[Nicholas Wourms]

Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Monday 07 April 2003 21:30, Josh McKinney wrote:
> 
> Hi Josh,
> 
> 
>>>Yeah sure here:
>>>http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4
>>
>                                       ^^^^
> 
>>Is this patch supposed to be against ck3?
> 
> 
> see? ;)

Actually, the Makefile hunk in the patch would have one 
believe that it is against -ck3...

Cheers,
Nicholas

Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck*

[Con Kolivas]

On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 06:03, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> > On Monday 07 April 2003 21:30, Josh McKinney wrote:
> >
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> >>>Yeah sure here:
> >>>http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4
> >
> >                                       ^^^^
> >
> >>Is this patch supposed to be against ck3?
> >
> > see? ;)
>
> Actually, the Makefile hunk in the patch would have one
> believe that it is against -ck3...

It's a simple minipatch against a 2.4.20 patched with the O(1),preempt,low 
latency combination which didn't change in ck4.

Con