From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263438AbTDGOLS (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:11:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263441AbTDGOLS (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:11:18 -0400 Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:28871 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263438AbTDGOLQ (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 10:11:16 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Marc-Christian Petersen , linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck* Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 00:15:11 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200304072353.47664.kernel@kolivas.org> <200304071617.56106.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> In-Reply-To: <200304071617.56106.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304080015.11111.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 00:17, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > On Monday 07 April 2003 15:53, Con Kolivas wrote: > > Hi Con, > > > I've had numerous requests for a backport of the interactivity changes to > > the O(1) scheduler for the -ck* kernels. I have resisted posting my > > backport because people had described real problems with these patches. > > However it seems most, if not all of the problems are related to one > > patch. Get them here: > > http://kernel.kolivas.org > > Why isn't this patch completely backed out from the main O(1) so we can see > what is new? Yeah sure here: http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4 Con