From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263785AbTDGXB5 (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:01:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263788AbTDGXB4 (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:01:56 -0400 Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:24720 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263785AbTDGWzl (for ); Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:55:41 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Nicholas Wourms , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Interactivity backport to 2.4.20-ck* Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 08:59:34 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200304072353.47664.kernel@kolivas.org> <200304072138.44957.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> <3E91D99E.3090807@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <3E91D99E.3090807@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304080859.34822.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Apr 2003 06:03, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > Marc-Christian Petersen wrote: > > On Monday 07 April 2003 21:30, Josh McKinney wrote: > > > > Hi Josh, > > > >>>Yeah sure here: > >>>http://kernel.kolivas.org/scheda3_ck4 > > > > ^^^^ > > > >>Is this patch supposed to be against ck3? > > > > see? ;) > > Actually, the Makefile hunk in the patch would have one > believe that it is against -ck3... It's a simple minipatch against a 2.4.20 patched with the O(1),preempt,low latency combination which didn't change in ck4. Con