From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261808AbTDICI1 (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 22:08:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261826AbTDICI1 (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 22:08:27 -0400 Received: from pcp749571pcs.manass01.va.comcast.net ([68.49.125.82]:48256 "EHLO charon.int.bittwiddlers.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261808AbTDICI0 (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 22:08:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 22:19:50 -0400 To: Kernel List Subject: handle_scancode in 2.5.32+ Message-ID: <20030409021944.GA1464@bittwiddlers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Matthew Harrell X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.68 (Shut Out) X-Primary-Address: mharrell@bittwiddlers.com Reply-To: Matthew Harrell Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm working to fix a couple of external modules so they will work with later 2.5 kernels. I've gotten the whole module building structure down fine but I can't seem to find any examples or documentation on a possible replacement for handle_scancode symbol that's accessible for a module. Any help or recommendations? -- Matthew Harrell If at first you don't succeed, Bit Twiddlers, Inc. try management. mharrell@bittwiddlers.com