From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262974AbTDIJ06 (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 05:26:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262976AbTDIJ06 (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 05:26:58 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:4455 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262974AbTDIJ05 (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 05:26:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:38:34 +0000 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjanv@redhat.com Subject: Re: ioctls Message-ID: <20030409093834.A15644@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <200304090506.h39564208670@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200304090506.h39564208670@devserv.devel.redhat.com>; from zaitcev@redhat.com on Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 01:06:04AM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 01:06:04AM -0400, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > ioctl definitions, and definitions of the argument structs > > to files there? > > There was a more comprehensive idea floated by Chrishtoff > Hellwig last week. We ought to ask Arjan (or find someone > else) to maintain glibc-kernelheaders as a community tarball > at kernel.org somewhere. Please, don't look at me. OK, only > if Arjan _REALLY_ refuses... Or perhaps you want to take > it yourself? This is basically your idea, only halfway > done: everything is copied already. Also, we do not need > a buy-in from Linus (though I suspect he'd support it). I have no problem with making the reduced headerset more generically available (and then clean it up more etc etc); it needs for more people than just me to care to make it worth it though.