From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262845AbTDIGmG (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 02:42:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262849AbTDIGmG (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 02:42:06 -0400 Received: from angband.namesys.com ([212.16.7.85]:20627 "HELO angband.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262845AbTDIGmG (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 02:42:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:53:39 +0400 From: Oleg Drokin To: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: 2.5.67 - reiserfs go boom. Message-ID: <20030409105339.A26788@namesys.com> References: <20030409011802.GD25834@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030409011802.GD25834@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 02:18:02AM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > Whilst running fsx.. (Though fsx didn't trigger any error, > and is still running).. > buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:127 > Call Trace: > [] __wait_on_buffer+0xd0/0xe0 > [] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 > [] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50 > [] reiserfs_unmap_buffer+0x68/0xa0 Andrew Morton said "That's not a bug. It is errant debugging code." because the page is locked by us, so buffers are safe. So I am not looking into this and hoping that somebody will fix the debugging code instead ;) Bye, Oleg