From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263812AbTDIU7L (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:59:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263818AbTDIU7I (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:59:08 -0400 Received: from crack.them.org ([65.125.64.184]:3202 "EHLO crack.them.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263812AbTDIU7F (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:59:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 17:10:43 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Disconnect Cc: lkml Subject: Re: glibc+sysenter sources..? Message-ID: <20030409211042.GA29819@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Disconnect , lkml References: <1049913600.18782.24.camel@sparky> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1049913600.18782.24.camel@sparky> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 02:40:00PM -0400, Disconnect wrote: > I found the binaries (ftp://people.redhat.com/drepper/glibc/2.3.1-25/) > but the sources don't seem to be available. (That makes it hard to > test, since my 2.5 system is running debian..) > > Preferable would be a patch against the standard 2.3.1 (rather than one > against the redhat sources) but I can probably detangle it if needed. > > Also, has this been tested under SMP or am I forging new ground? (dual > ppro 200 system under 2.5.66-bk10.) Just get a recent version of glibc. 2.3.2 includes the patches, I think. That'll be in Debian/unstable in another week or so I bet. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer