public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Walt H <waltabbyh@comcast.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.20-ck5
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 01:01:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200304120101.32423.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E96D711.70404@comcast.net>

On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:54, Walt H wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've compiled a new kernel using the ck5 patchset you made, but have had
> some problems. It seems that with my configuration, I expose a memory
> leak somewhere. After the system has been up for a while, or if I try to
> compile anything non-trivial (kde-libs for example), The system will use
> up all available memory and further memory alloc's fail. Swap is hardly
> being used in this case. My syslog file does report:

> Typically, apps fail although the OOM killer isn't triggered (not sure
> if it's enabled in ck5).

OOMK not enabled in -ck*

> I'm wondering if there's a strange interaction with XFS? I also use the
> Nvidia driver, however, I also tested without loading it and receive the
> same results. My XFS thought is due to the strange behaviour of the
> filesystem with this patchset. When I tried compiling kdelibs, the
> system chugged along until memory was used (15-20 mins) and then the
> compile could no longer proceed. After seeing this and issuing a 'sync',
> the drives thrashed for approx. 30-45 seconds as if flushing unwritten
> data. It's as if writes are being stored indefinitely? Reverting back to
> ck4 and all is well. System info below:

XFS must be responsible. I can't test it fully myself but it appears to be 
related to the latest xfs update I've included in -ck5 which is a snapshot 
from the sgi website only a week old. Until further notice, use ck4 if you 
wish to use XFS.

Thanks for the feedback.

Con

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-11 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-11 14:54 2.4.20-ck5 Walt H
2003-04-11 15:01 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-04-11 15:05   ` 2.4.20-ck5 Walt H
2003-04-11 15:11     ` 2.4.20-ck5 Con Kolivas
2003-04-11 15:34     ` 2.4.20-ck5 Con Kolivas
2003-04-11 15:58       ` 2.4.20-ck5 Walt H
2003-04-11 16:45 ` 2.4.20-ck5 Bob Johnson
2003-04-11 16:58   ` 2.4.20-ck5 Con Kolivas
2003-04-11 17:12     ` 2.4.20-ck5 Bob Johnson
2003-04-15  1:41 ` 2.4.20-ck5 Daniel Gryniewicz
2003-04-15  2:06   ` 2.4.20-ck5 Con Kolivas
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-09 14:50 2.4.20-ck5 Con Kolivas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200304120101.32423.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=waltabbyh@comcast.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox