From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264374AbTDKPUx (for ); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:20:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264380AbTDKPUx (for ); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:20:53 -0400 Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:60893 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264374AbTDKPUx (for ); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:20:53 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Walt H Subject: Re: 2.4.20-ck5 Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 01:34:14 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 Cc: linux-kernel References: <3E96D711.70404@comcast.net> <200304120101.32423.kernel@kolivas.org> <3E96D9B5.5060704@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <3E96D9B5.5060704@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304120134.14883.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 01:05, Walt H wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > > XFS must be responsible. I can't test it fully myself but it appears to > > be related to the latest xfs update I've included in -ck5 which is a > > snapshot from the sgi website only a week old. Until further notice, use > > ck4 if you wish to use XFS. > > > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > > Con > > Thanks Con. Now that I think about it, I probably should've cc'd the xfs > list. There was some work done on memory leaks in XFS recently - > something in here must expose additional leaks. Thanks again, Ok I've posted the old xfs patch (1.2pre5) on my website which is known to work with -ck*. So if you wish to use xfs and ck5 please use the separated out patches. Con