public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.21-pre7 ide request races
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 03:07:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030414030751.7bf17b04.akpm@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030414093418.GQ9776@suse.de>

Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
>
> We've had some problems with request corruption on IDE in the past, IBM
> traced these to stack corruption. In various places, the IDE code does
> something ala:
> 
> submission:
> 	struct request rq;
> 
> 	...
> 	ide_do_drive_cmd(drive, &rq, ide_wait);
> 
> ide_end_request:
> 	...
> 	blkdev_release_request()
> 
> which works fine, as long as the stack persists for the
> blkdev_release_request() call, but it may not if the task has already
> exited (CPU0 may be waiting in ide_do_drive_cmd(), CPU1 gets the
> completion interrupt, task is woken, and exits, CPU0 now calls
> blkdev_release_request()). The result is random stack corruption (or
> request list corruption, rq->q may have been scrippled!), not good.
> 

Those locally allocated requests are foul, and the patch is a good cleanup,
but is a simpler fix more appropriate?

The bug is in end_that_request_last(), yes?

void end_that_request_last(struct request *req)
{
	if (req->waiting != NULL)
		complete(req->waiting);
	req_finished_io(req);

	blkdev_release_request(req);
}

Wouldn't it be simpler to just do:

void end_that_request_last(struct request *req)
{
	struct completion *c = req->waiting;

	req_finished_io(req);
	blkdev_release_request(req);
	if (c)
		complete(c);
}


I vaguely seem to remember being told months ago why this wasn't right ;)


  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-14  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-14  9:34 [PATCH] 2.4.21-pre7 ide request races Jens Axboe
2003-04-14 10:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-04-14 10:17   ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-14 10:23     ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-14 10:27       ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-14 10:58         ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-14 16:15         ` Mike Anderson
2003-04-14 19:02           ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030414030751.7bf17b04.akpm@digeo.com \
    --to=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox