From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, marcelo@conectiva.com.br,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.21-pre7 ide request races
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 03:07:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030414030751.7bf17b04.akpm@digeo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030414093418.GQ9776@suse.de>
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
>
> We've had some problems with request corruption on IDE in the past, IBM
> traced these to stack corruption. In various places, the IDE code does
> something ala:
>
> submission:
> struct request rq;
>
> ...
> ide_do_drive_cmd(drive, &rq, ide_wait);
>
> ide_end_request:
> ...
> blkdev_release_request()
>
> which works fine, as long as the stack persists for the
> blkdev_release_request() call, but it may not if the task has already
> exited (CPU0 may be waiting in ide_do_drive_cmd(), CPU1 gets the
> completion interrupt, task is woken, and exits, CPU0 now calls
> blkdev_release_request()). The result is random stack corruption (or
> request list corruption, rq->q may have been scrippled!), not good.
>
Those locally allocated requests are foul, and the patch is a good cleanup,
but is a simpler fix more appropriate?
The bug is in end_that_request_last(), yes?
void end_that_request_last(struct request *req)
{
if (req->waiting != NULL)
complete(req->waiting);
req_finished_io(req);
blkdev_release_request(req);
}
Wouldn't it be simpler to just do:
void end_that_request_last(struct request *req)
{
struct completion *c = req->waiting;
req_finished_io(req);
blkdev_release_request(req);
if (c)
complete(c);
}
I vaguely seem to remember being told months ago why this wasn't right ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-14 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-14 9:34 [PATCH] 2.4.21-pre7 ide request races Jens Axboe
2003-04-14 10:07 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-04-14 10:17 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-14 10:23 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-14 10:27 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-14 10:58 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-14 16:15 ` Mike Anderson
2003-04-14 19:02 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030414030751.7bf17b04.akpm@digeo.com \
--to=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox