From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263769AbTDNU41 (for ); Mon, 14 Apr 2003 16:56:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263767AbTDNU41 (for ); Mon, 14 Apr 2003 16:56:27 -0400 Received: from smtp015.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.173.59]:4105 "HELO smtp015.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263769AbTDNU40 (for ); Mon, 14 Apr 2003 16:56:26 -0400 From: Michael Buesch To: Dave Jones Subject: Re: 2.5 'what to expect' document. Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:08:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030414193138.GA24870@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20030414193138.GA24870@suse.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304142308.03553.fsdeveloper@yahoo.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 14 April 2003 21:31, Dave Jones wrote: > Extra tainting. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Running certain AMD processors in SMP boxes is out of spec, and will taint > the kernel with the 'S' flag. Running 2 Athlon XPs for example may seem to > work fine, but may also introduce difficult to pin down bugs. > In time it's likely this tainting will be extended to cover other out of > spec cases. Will it be implemented in future to taint the kernel if CPU is overclocked? -- Regards Michael Buesch. http://www.8ung.at/tuxsoft $ cat /dev/zero > /dev/null /dev/null: That's *not* funny! :(