From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Duncan Sands <baldrick@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUGed to death
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:05:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030415120457.GA11998@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200304151357.32819.baldrick@wanadoo.fr>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:57:32PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> It is questionable. Since even in core kernel code there are
> many places with
> if (cond)
> BUG();
> rather than
> BUG_ON(cond);
> it may be worth seeing if converting them makes a difference
> (increases code size though).
The spinlock code sticks out as a possible good target.
Any takers for benchmarking ?
Dave
diff -urpN --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude bk-linus/include/asm-i386/mmu_context.h linux-2.5/include/asm-i386/mmu_context.h
--- bk-linus/include/asm-i386/mmu_context.h 2003-04-10 06:01:31.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.5/include/asm-i386/mmu_context.h 2003-04-15 06:02:46.000000000 +0100
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_s
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
else {
cpu_tlbstate[cpu].state = TLBSTATE_OK;
- if (cpu_tlbstate[cpu].active_mm != next)
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON (cpu_tlbstate[cpu].active_mm != next);
+
if (!test_and_set_bit(cpu, &next->cpu_vm_mask)) {
/* We were in lazy tlb mode and leave_mm disabled
* tlb flush IPI delivery. We must reload %cr3.
diff -urpN --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude bk-linus/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h linux-2.5/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h
--- bk-linus/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h 2003-04-10 06:01:31.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.5/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h 2003-04-15 06:02:46.000000000 +0100
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <asm/rwlock.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <linux/config.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
extern int printk(const char * fmt, ...)
__attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 2)));
@@ -70,10 +71,8 @@ typedef struct {
static inline void _raw_spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
- if (lock->magic != SPINLOCK_MAGIC)
- BUG();
- if (!spin_is_locked(lock))
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON (lock->magic != SPINLOCK_MAGIC);
+ BUG_ON (!spin_is_locked(lock));
#endif
__asm__ __volatile__(
spin_unlock_string
@@ -91,10 +90,8 @@ static inline void _raw_spin_unlock(spin
{
char oldval = 1;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
- if (lock->magic != SPINLOCK_MAGIC)
- BUG();
- if (!spin_is_locked(lock))
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON (lock->magic != SPINLOCK_MAGIC);
+ BUG_ON (!spin_is_locked(lock));
#endif
__asm__ __volatile__(
spin_unlock_string
@@ -118,8 +115,8 @@ static inline void _raw_spin_lock(spinlo
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
__label__ here;
here:
- if (lock->magic != SPINLOCK_MAGIC) {
-printk("eip: %p\n", &&here);
+ if (unlikely(lock->magic != SPINLOCK_MAGIC)) {
+ printk("eip: %p\n", &&here);
BUG();
}
#endif
@@ -174,8 +171,7 @@ typedef struct {
static inline void _raw_read_lock(rwlock_t *rw)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
- if (rw->magic != RWLOCK_MAGIC)
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON (rw->magic != RWLOCK_MAGIC);
#endif
__build_read_lock(rw, "__read_lock_failed");
}
@@ -183,8 +179,7 @@ static inline void _raw_read_lock(rwlock
static inline void _raw_write_lock(rwlock_t *rw)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
- if (rw->magic != RWLOCK_MAGIC)
- BUG();
+ BUG_ON (rw->magic != RWLOCK_MAGIC);
#endif
__build_write_lock(rw, "__write_lock_failed");
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-15 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-14 20:19 BUGed to death Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-14 20:40 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-14 21:02 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-14 21:10 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-14 21:17 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-15 11:57 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-15 12:05 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2003-04-15 14:39 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-23 15:08 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-14 21:00 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-14 20:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-14 21:08 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-14 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-14 21:55 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-15 0:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-15 12:01 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-15 12:31 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-15 12:36 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-15 12:40 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-15 12:49 ` Sean Neakums
2003-04-15 12:52 ` Sean Neakums
2003-04-15 13:01 ` Roman Zippel
2003-04-15 13:17 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-15 13:55 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-15 14:22 ` Jens Axboe
2003-04-15 14:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-15 14:39 ` Duncan Sands
2003-04-15 14:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-15 14:58 ` Duncan Sands
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-15 14:30 rwhron
2003-04-15 15:57 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-15 16:11 ` Nick Piggin
2003-04-15 16:42 ` Michael Buesch
2003-04-15 16:45 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-15 18:33 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030415120457.GA11998@suse.de \
--to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=baldrick@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox