From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261292AbTDOM1h (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:27:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261309AbTDOM1h (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:27:37 -0400 Received: from deviant.impure.org.uk ([195.82.120.238]:40332 "EHLO deviant.impure.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261292AbTDOM1g (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 08:27:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:36:45 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Jens Axboe Cc: Duncan Sands , "Martin J. Bligh" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel Subject: Re: BUGed to death Message-ID: <20030415123641.GA13966@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Jens Axboe , Duncan Sands , "Martin J. Bligh" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel References: <80690000.1050351598@flay> <200304151401.00704.baldrick@wanadoo.fr> <20030415123134.GM9776@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030415123134.GM9776@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 02:31:34PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > If you do that, you must audit every single BUG_ON to make sure the > expression doesn't have any side effects. > > BUG_ON(do_the_good_stuff()); Sure, but such a construct looks really bad anyway. Relying on side-effects of whats essentially a debug macro sounds very dodgy. foo = do_the_good_stuff(); BUG_ON (foo==baz) Would be a better way of expressing this. Dave