public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Hicks <mort@wildopensource.com>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>,
	Martin Hicks <mort@wildopensource.com>,
	hpa@zytor.com, pavel@ucw.cz, jes@wildopensource.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wildos@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [patch] printk subsystems
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:27:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030415132741.GR3413@bork.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304141325010.14087-100000@cherise>



On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 01:33:54PM -0500, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> 
> > I don't like the #define DEBUG approach.  It's useless for users; it's a
> > developer debug tool.  It won't allow some support staff to ask users to
> > enable module debugging (or subsystem debugging) and see what gets printed.
> 
> Agreed. Having a runtime-tweakable field would be very handy, and 
> something that's been requested many times over. 
> 
> > Martin, you are ahead of my schedule, but I was planning to use sysfs
> > to add a 'debug' flag/file that could be dynamically altered on a per-module
> > basis.
> 
> Something I've pondered in the past is a per-subsystem (as in struct 
> subsystem) debug field and log buffer. When the subsystem is registered, a 
> sysfs 'debug' file is created, from which the user can set the noisiness 
> level. 
> 
> >From there, each subsystem can specify the size of a log buffer, which 
> would be allocated also when the subsystem is registered. Messages from 
> the subsystem, and kobjects belonging to it, would be copied into the 
> local log buffer. 
> 
> Wrapper functions can be created, similar to the dev_* functions, which 
> take a kobject as the first parameter. From this, the subsystem and log 
> buffer, can be derived (or rather, passed to a lower-level helper). 
> 
> This all falls under the 'gee-whiz-this-might-be-neat' category, and may
> inherently suck; I haven't tried it. Doing the core code is < 1 day's
> work, though there would be nothing that actually used it..

I'm not sure that this addresses the core problem that I'm trying to
deal with.  The problem is that machines with certain configurations
(large number of CPUs, Nodes, or a bunch of SCSI and disks) display far
too many messages to the console, resulting in the log buffer being
overflowed.  The method that I'm proposing simply allows you to decide
what gets logged when a printk() happens, depending on the message's
priority and which subsystem it originated from.

mh

-- 
Wild Open Source Inc.                  mort@wildopensource.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-04-15 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-07 20:13 [patch] printk subsystems Martin Hicks
2003-04-08 18:41 ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-08 20:02   ` Jes Sorensen
2003-04-08 21:02     ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-08 21:10       ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-08 21:57         ` Pavel Machek
2003-04-08 22:02           ` Jes Sorensen
2003-04-08 22:05           ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-08 22:55             ` Martin Hicks
2003-04-08 23:10               ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-04-14 18:33                 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-04-14 22:33                   ` Daniel Stekloff
2003-04-16 18:42                     ` Patrick Mochel
2003-04-16 12:35                       ` Daniel Stekloff
2003-04-16 19:16                       ` Martin Hicks
2003-04-16 12:43                         ` Daniel Stekloff
2003-04-17 15:56                           ` Martin Hicks
2003-04-17 13:58                             ` Karim Yaghmour
2003-04-15 13:27                   ` Martin Hicks [this message]
2003-04-15 14:40                     ` Karim Yaghmour
2003-04-08 22:00       ` Jes Sorensen
2003-04-11 19:21 ` Martin Hicks
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-08 23:15 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-17 19:58 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-17 20:34 ` Karim Yaghmour
2003-04-17 21:03   ` Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-17 21:37     ` Tom Zanussi
2003-04-18  7:21     ` Tom Zanussi
2003-04-18  7:42     ` Greg KH
2003-04-21 15:56     ` Karim Yaghmour
2003-04-21 18:23 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-21 18:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-21 18:42 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-22  2:49 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-22  4:34 ` Karim Yaghmour
2003-04-22  3:04 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-22  6:00 ` Tom Zanussi
2003-04-22  4:02 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-22  5:52 ` Karim Yaghmour
2003-04-22  6:04 ` Tom Zanussi
2003-04-22  5:09 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-24 18:22 ` bob
2003-04-22 18:46 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-22 23:28 ` Karim Yaghmour
2003-04-22 19:02 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-22 19:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-22 21:52 ` Tom Zanussi
2003-04-22 22:53 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-23  3:58 ` Tom Zanussi
2003-04-23  0:28 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2003-04-24 18:56 Manfred Spraul
2003-04-24 19:10 ` bob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030415132741.GR3413@bork.org \
    --to=mort@wildopensource.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jes@wildopensource.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mochel@osdl.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=wildos@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox