public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: ak@muc.de, akpm@digeo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	anton@samba.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, davidm@hpl.hp.com,
	matthew@wil.cx, ralf@linux-mips.org, rth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Reduce struct page by 8 bytes on 64bit
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:22:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030416092203.R13397@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030416.054521.26525548.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 05:45:21AM -0700

On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 05:45:21AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>    From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
>    Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 13:24:30 +0200
>    
>    I worked around this by declaring a new data type atomic_bitmask32
>    with matching set_bit32/clear_bit32 etc. interfaces. Currently only 
>    on x86-64 aomitc_bitmask32 is defined to unsigned, everybody else
>    still uses unsigned long. The other 64bit architectures can define it to
>    unsigned too if they can confirm that it's ok to do.
> 
> I have no problem with this.
> 
> If you are clever, you can define a generic version even for the
> "unsigned long" 64-bit platforms.  It's left as an exercise to
> the reader :-)

Why is any new macro needed?

struct page
{
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && defined __BIG_ENDIAN
  union {
    unsigned long flags;
    atomic_t count;
  };
#elif BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && defined __LITTLE_ENDIAN
  union {
    unsigned long flags;
    struct {
      int : 32;
      atomic_t count;
    };
  };
#else
  unsigned long flags;
  atomic_t count;
#endif
...
};

should do the job.

	Jakub

  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-16 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-15 11:24 Reduce struct page by 8 bytes on 64bit Andi Kleen
2003-04-16 12:45 ` David S. Miller
2003-04-16 13:22   ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2003-04-16 14:07   ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-16 14:26     ` David S. Miller
2003-04-16 14:43       ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-16 14:38         ` David S. Miller
2003-04-16 14:58           ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-16 14:58             ` David S. Miller
2003-04-16 14:55         ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-04-16 15:04           ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-16 15:00             ` David S. Miller
2003-04-16 15:11             ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-04-16 20:35               ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-16 21:26                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-04-16 21:43                   ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-16 21:40                     ` David S. Miller
2003-04-17 15:20                       ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030416092203.R13397@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox