From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264199AbTDPCCx (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:02:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264205AbTDPCCx (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:02:53 -0400 Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:58305 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264199AbTDPCCw (for ); Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:02:52 -0400 From: Con Kolivas To: Joshua Kwan Subject: Re: [2.4.20-ck6] Rmap15f patch fails in vmscan.c Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:16:24 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 Cc: linux-kernel mailing list References: <20030416013942.GA31943@triplehelix.org> In-Reply-To: <20030416013942.GA31943@triplehelix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304161216.25010.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:39, Joshua Kwan wrote: > The subject says it all. Extracted a clean 2.4.20 tree, patched it with > the full -ck6 patch, then applied the rmap15f patch, and it fails in > mm/vmscan.c. Give it a try for yourself... :) > > (The reason why I haven't just fixed it myself is because the rejects > file is really big, and it seems to me like something you can easily > correct with your sources, by rediffing against the right version of the > file or something.) Woops my bad. Will fix asap. Con