From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: ak@muc.de, akpm@digeo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
anton@samba.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, davidm@hpl.hp.com,
matthew@wil.cx, ralf@linux-mips.org, rth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Reduce struct page by 8 bytes on 64bit
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:58:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030416145853.GA2421@averell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030416.073814.124147956.davem@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 04:38:14PM +0200, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:43:12 +0200
>
> On sparc64. But is that true too for all other 64bit architectures supported?
>
> e.g. How about PA-RISC? (always seems to do things differently)
>
> It cannot require more than the existing API requires, which is
> "unsigned long *bitmask", ie. anything equivalent in behavior to an
> unsigned long pointer is good enough.
Sure, but perhaps it does assume all accesses to this bitmap are going
through the set_bit functions. e.g. consider an implementation that
uses a spinlock for this - parisc seems to do that for example
from a quick look into their bitops.h. And they have an 64bit kernel
too.
In this case part of the unsigned long could be accessed directly
using the aliasing.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-16 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-15 11:24 Reduce struct page by 8 bytes on 64bit Andi Kleen
2003-04-16 12:45 ` David S. Miller
2003-04-16 13:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-04-16 14:07 ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-16 14:26 ` David S. Miller
2003-04-16 14:43 ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-16 14:38 ` David S. Miller
2003-04-16 14:58 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2003-04-16 14:58 ` David S. Miller
2003-04-16 14:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-04-16 15:04 ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-16 15:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-04-16 15:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-04-16 20:35 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-16 21:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-04-16 21:43 ` Andrew Morton
2003-04-16 21:40 ` David S. Miller
2003-04-17 15:20 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030416145853.GA2421@averell \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox