From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BK+PATCH] remove __constant_memcpy
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 05:11:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030417051126.W13397@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030417090444.A4209@devserv.devel.redhat.com>; from arjanv@redhat.com on Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:04:44AM +0000
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 09:04:44AM +0000, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:02:43AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 17 Apr 2003, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > > it can do that ANYWAY for all kinds of things.
> > > We really should ask the gcc folks to add a
> > > -fdontyoudareusefloatingpoint flag (well different name probably) to
> > > make sure it never ever will generate FP code. (would also help catch
> > > abusers of FP code in the kernel as a bonus ;)
> >
> > -msoft-float?
>
> that is a decent start but has a different effect, eg it doesnt' actually
> forbid gcc from generatic fpu code, just tells it to use emu lib functions
> for it .
But the emu lib functions aren't provided in the kernel, so you'll get
errors anyway.
On some targets the option is -mno-fpu though (e.g. sparc* kernels use
it for eons).
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-17 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-17 0:57 [BK+PATCH] remove __constant_memcpy Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 1:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 2:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-17 8:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-04-17 9:02 ` Roman Zippel
2003-04-17 9:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-04-17 9:11 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2003-04-17 16:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-17 19:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 19:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-17 23:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 23:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-18 0:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-04-18 9:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-04-18 14:31 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-18 15:07 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-04-17 22:58 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-04-17 23:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 13:17 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-17 13:17 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-17 14:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 14:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-17 20:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-17 2:22 Nakajima, Jun
2003-04-17 23:50 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030417051126.W13397@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox