From: jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's the deal McNeil? Bad interactive behavior in X w/ RH's 2.4.18
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 02:56:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030422095635.GR16934@pegasys.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38291.207.172.171.44.1051004102.squirrel@miallen.com>
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 05:35:02AM -0400, Michael B Allen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 April 2003 09:48, Michael B Allen wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> >> I'm running Red Hat 7.3 with their stock 2.4.18-3 kernel on an IBM
> >> T30. Once every few hours X locks up for 5-10 seconds while the disk
> >> grinds. If I type in an Xterm the characters are not echoed until the
> <snip>
> >> I would like very much for this behavior to go away as it is extremely
> >> annoying. If there is a patch please let me know where I can get it.
> > There are some hacks. One by Andrea Arcangeli, one by Neil Schemenauer and
> > one
> > by Con Kolivas and me. Search the archives please (lowlat elevator/io
> > scheduler)
>
> Ok, I searched a little using the Googler at indiana.edu's archives but
> nothing jumped up and bit me. I'm not too excited about applying a patch
> snarfed out of an e-mail anywat.
That's how Linus, Marcello and everyone else gets them.
> I'm surprised no one else has not
> complained about this enough to the point where you guys don't have a
> canned answer with a link. Is this problem not considered important?
>
> Does anyone know which RH patch in the 2.4.18-10 RPM adds this elevator
> throughput "improvement"? What identifiers would such a patch have in it?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> PS: Why are there only "hacks"? Is this not considered important?
It is up to Red Hat to $upply fixes for their kernels.
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: jw@pegasys.ws
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-22 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-22 7:48 What's the deal McNeil? Bad interactive behavior in X w/ RH's 2.4.18 Michael B Allen
2003-04-22 8:06 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-04-22 9:35 ` Michael B Allen
2003-04-22 9:56 ` jw schultz [this message]
2003-04-22 14:06 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-22 9:59 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-04-23 3:31 ` J Sloan
2003-04-22 14:19 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030422095635.GR16934@pegasys.ws \
--to=jw@pegasys.ws \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox