From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264646AbTDZK2g (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2003 06:28:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264645AbTDZK2b (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2003 06:28:31 -0400 Received: from uni00du.unity.ncsu.edu ([152.1.13.100]:2688 "EHLO uni00du.unity.ncsu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264644AbTDZK2F (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Apr 2003 06:28:05 -0400 From: jlnance@unity.ncsu.edu Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 06:40:15 -0400 To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE & stack location Message-ID: <20030426104015.GA853@ncsu.edu> References: <459930000.1051302738@[10.10.2.4]> <1750000.1051305030@[10.10.2.4]> <3EA9B061.600@techsource.com> <3280000.1051308382@[10.10.2.4]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3280000.1051308382@[10.10.2.4]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 03:06:23PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > If you're so strapped for process space that you > > need that extra 128Mb, then you probably shouldn't be using a 32-bit > > processor. > > Point me at a cheap 32 cpu 64-bit machine. Market realities dicate > otherwise. Do you have a cheap 32 cpu 32-bit machine? SMP?