From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2003@gmx.net>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Henti Smith <bain@tcsn.co.za>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
Riley Williams <Riley@Williams.Name>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: maximum possible memory limit ..
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 15:43:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030428224301.GX30441@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EAD61FB.30907@us.ibm.com>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 10:16:43AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Nobody knows how far it will go. It's fairly safe to say that, at this
> rate, Linux will keep up with whatever hardware anyone produces.
> Unless, of course, someone gets even more perverse than PAE. :)
32-bit kernels on 64-bit machines with RAM capacities larger than 64GB
would seem to raise issues far more severe than i386 PAE, but to date
little (if any) interest has been expressed in using Linux in such
scenarios.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-28 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-24 18:05 maximum possible memory limit Henti Smith
2003-04-24 18:35 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-04-28 13:08 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2003-04-28 14:10 ` [Lse-tech] " Andi Kleen
2003-04-28 15:11 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2003-04-28 15:16 ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-28 16:52 ` Dave Hansen
2003-04-28 16:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-28 22:40 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-28 23:50 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-29 0:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-29 0:06 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-29 0:13 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-28 22:34 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-28 22:33 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-29 4:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-28 16:45 ` Dave Hansen
2003-04-28 16:57 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2003-04-28 17:13 ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-28 17:53 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-28 18:31 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2003-04-28 19:05 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-28 17:16 ` Dave Hansen
2003-04-28 17:36 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2003-04-28 17:44 ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-28 22:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-04-28 22:43 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-04-28 18:57 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-04-28 17:14 ` Andi Kleen
2003-04-28 17:26 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030428224301.GX30441@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=Riley@Williams.Name \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bain@tcsn.co.za \
--cc=c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2003@gmx.net \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox