From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262005AbTD2Ncc (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:32:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262009AbTD2Ncc (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:32:32 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([212.34.181.86]:62480 "EHLO verein.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262005AbTD2Nca (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:32:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:44:44 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: torvalds@transmeta.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] update dcache documentation Message-ID: <20030429154444.B23413@lst.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Update the dcache section in Documentation/filesystems/Locking to match reality. Note that there's other parts of this file that are badly out of date - I'll look into it later. --- 1.40/Documentation/filesystems/Locking Fri Feb 14 21:26:42 2003 +++ edited/Documentation/filesystems/Locking Mon Apr 21 10:54:15 2003 @@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ locking rules: none have BKL - dcache_lock may block -d_revalidate: no yes -d_hash no yes -d_compare: no no -d_delete: yes no -d_release: no yes -d_iput: no yes + dcache_lock rename_lock ->d_lock may block +d_revalidate: no no no yes +d_hash no no no yes +d_compare: no yes no no +d_delete: yes no yes no +d_release: no no no yes +d_iput: no no no yes --------------------------- inode_operations --------------------------- prototypes: