* Re: Flame Linus to a crisp! AKA DRM
@ 2003-04-30 10:44 Dean McEwan
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dean McEwan @ 2003-04-30 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003, Zack Gilburd wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 03:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
> Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org> wrote:
Oooh suprise.
>
> > There is one fundamental problem, and nobody has addressed.
> >
> > Who will enforce the GPL over DRM violations?
The copyright author if they so choose to do so.
> > Since it is a blanket over the entire kernel, and you have formally
> > (for the most part) have authorized DRM, thus one assumes you are the only
> > one who can pursue in a court of law.
>
> Unless I am missing something, I was hoping for more of a sparse DRM \
> implementation; not a blanket.
> I was hoping to be able to `modprobe drm` for when I needed to use DRM and likewise \
> `rmmod drm` for when I didn't want it. Maybe I am a little late in this \
> disucssion, but that's just my hopes and whishes.
--
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-04-30 10:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-30 10:44 Flame Linus to a crisp! AKA DRM Dean McEwan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox