public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Schlichter <schlicht@uni-mannheim.de>
To: dphillips@sistina.com, Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>,
	hugang <hugang@soulinfo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 03:47:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305020347.42682.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200305020243.15248.dphillips@sistina.com>

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1900 bytes --]

On May 2, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Friday 02 May 2003 02:10, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > At first, I thought you had coded an FFS instead of an FLS. But I
> > realized it's valid, and is fast because one half of the numbers tested
> > will not even take one iteration.
>
> Aha, and duh.  At 1 million iterations, my binary search clobbers the shift
> version by a factor of four.  At 2**31 iterations, my version also wins, by
> 20%.
>
> I should note that the iterations parameter to my benchmark program is
> deeply flawed, since it changes the nature of the input set, not just the
> number of iterations.  Fortunately, all tests I've done have been with
> 2**32 iterations, giving a perfectly uniform distribution of input values.

That is what I posted in my first message in this thread... The shift 
algorithm only works fine for uniform distributed input values... But here is 
a version that behaves better for small values, too. I don't think it will 
reach the tree version but it should be much better that the old version!

int fls_shift(int x)
{
	int bit;

	if(x & 0xFFFF0000) {
		bit = 32;
 
		while(x > 0) {
			--bit;
			x <<= 1;
		}
	} else {
		bit = 0;
 
		while(x) {
			++bit;
			x >>= 1;
		}
	}

	return bit;
}

For me this version even speeds up the uniform distributed benchmark...

> For uniformly distributed inputs the simple shift loop does well, but for
> calculating floor(log2(x)) it's much worse than the fancier alternatives. 
> I suspect typical usage leans more to the latter than the former.

If this is the case the tree version will surely be the best!

But I think this topic is not worth any further work as this is not used very 
often... So this version will be my last one!

But this was a good example how suited algorithms can speed up benchmarks ;-)

> Regards,
>
> Daniel

Best regards
  Thomas

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-02  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-30  2:46 [RFC][PATCH] Faster generic_fls Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30  7:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-04-30  8:36   ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-04-30  8:43     ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-04-30  8:52     ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-04-30  8:51       ` P
2003-04-30 13:51   ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 11:14 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 13:03   ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 13:17     ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 14:07       ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 14:11   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 14:53     ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 15:28       ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 16:03         ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 16:16           ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 16:43             ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 20:25             ` Alan Cox
2003-04-30 21:59               ` Falk Hueffner
2003-04-30 22:22                 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-30 23:41               ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 22:47                 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-01  0:12                 ` Falk Hueffner
2003-05-01  1:07                   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 19:15     ` Daniel Phillips
2003-04-30 20:59       ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-01  1:02         ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-01  9:19           ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-01 16:02             ` Linus Torvalds
2003-04-30 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-01  5:03   ` hugang
2003-05-01  5:11     ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-01  5:33       ` hugang
2003-05-01  7:05         ` hugang
2003-05-01 13:52           ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 14:14             ` Falk Hueffner
2003-05-01 14:26               ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 14:53             ` hugang
2003-05-01 15:54               ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-02  0:33                 ` hugang
2003-05-01 17:16               ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 23:27                 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-02  0:10                   ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-02  0:43                     ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-02  0:54                       ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-02 12:21                         ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-02  1:47                       ` Thomas Schlichter [this message]
2003-05-02 13:24                         ` Willy Tarreau
2003-05-02  0:13                   ` Daniel Phillips
2003-05-02  0:13             ` Lincoln Dale
2003-05-01  5:16   ` hugang
2003-05-01 10:22     ` Willy TARREAU
2003-05-01 11:17       ` hugang
2003-05-01 11:45         ` Willy TARREAU
     [not found] <87d6j34jad.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304301801210.20283-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-05-01  1:46   ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-01  4:40     ` Linus Torvalds
2003-05-01 12:00       ` David S. Miller
2003-05-02  5:14         ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-01 13:31 linux
2003-05-01 17:15 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-02  8:50 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-02  9:37 ` Peter Osterlund
2003-05-02 10:04 Chuck Ebbert
2003-05-02 22:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-03  2:21 Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200305020347.42682.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de \
    --to=schlicht@uni-mannheim.de \
    --cc=dphillips@sistina.com \
    --cc=hugang@soulinfo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@w.ods.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox